HOOK 'EM
WHILE THEY ARE YOUNG?
Marketers love the
youth market. The well publicised "aging of the population"
has done little, it seems, to change marketers' behaviour.
Advertisers still strive to keep established brands young and
fashionable. And in spite of a lack of evidence of any
successful brand level segmentation, we see the launches of
brands specifically targeting 'the youth segment'.
What makes young buyers so desirable, or older buyers so
unattractive ? Two dominant explanations exist, one cynical
view is that marketers and advertising agencies are staffed
by young (or youth obsessed) people who create marketing
campaigns to appeal to people who are like them. The other
theory says that young people are less brand loyal. The aim
is to grab them while they are young, and work hard to retain
them through their fickle youth until they become staid and
brand loyal later on, when you no longer have to worry about
losing them.
But are older people more brand loyal ? Are young people less
loyal ?
Is loyalty in general fading away ? Is the youth of today
more fickle than ever before ?
The marketing mythology says Yes, Yes, Yes, Yes. But it is
wrong, wrong, wrong wrong.
Extensive research across a broad range grocery products
shows that the repeat-buying of older consumers is not
different from that of young consumers. Both groups tend to
buy from fairly fixed repertoires of brands. Contrary to
popular belief older consumers don't have smaller
repertoires. Likewise then, the view that young consumers are
inherently fickle or that they buy from a wide range of
brands while they sort out their preferences is also
incorrect.
Each generation of marketers likes to feel that they have got
it tough, that consumer loyalty is not what it used to be.
But there is no evidence of any wholesale decline in brand
loyalty. Changes in the loyalty levels in a product category
are largely to do with the number of brands competing in the
category. Some categories have more competitors than they
used to - and it is here that marketers complain about
declining loyalty, while other categories have fewer
competitors (eg, computer operating systems) and therefore
fewer complaints from the brands that remain.
These myths aside, is there still value in targeting young
consumers, particularly ones entering the market for the
first time (ie gaining wages and becoming buyers)?
An important consideration in answering this question is:
does loyalty exist ? Presumably if it does, then gaining
young, ie, new buyers, is important – there's a
fighting chance you'll have them for life (or at least a
decent period). If loyalty doesn't exist then it makes no
sense to talk about gaining new customers – one sale
gives no indication that there will be another.
The good news for youth obsessed marketers is that there are
volumes of evidence in support that loyalty does exist. It's
usually ‘divided loyalty’, buyers maintain a
portfolio or repertoire of brands that they buy from, but
this divided loyalty appears to be fairly stable. Buyers
maintain the composition of their repertoires for quite long
periods it seems. Indeed, a longitudinal study that followed
the first-brand loyalty (the brand used most) of a group of
US high school students showed a surprising degree of
stability in preferences from their last year of high school
to 12 and then 20 years later.
So winning new customers looks attractive, since they are
likely to stay for a long time. In this respect maybe young
buyers are more attractive in that they will be around for
longer – but to think that they will be any easier to
win (or lose) than older customers are is quite incorrect.
Age, it seems, has nothing to do with loyalty.
By Byron Sharp
Uncles, Mark D. and Andrew S. C. Ehrenberg (1990), "Brand
Choice Among Older Consumers," Journal of Advertising
Research (August/September), 19-22.
Guest, Lester (1964), "Brand Loyalty Revisited a Twenty Year
Report," Journal of Applied Psychology, 48 (2), 93-97.
Dekimpe, Marnik G., Jan-Benedict E.M. Steenkamp, Martin
Mellens, and Piet Vanden Abeele (1997), "Decline and
Variability in Brand Loyalty," International Journal of
Research in Marketing, 14 (No. 5), 405-20.